Some basic principles - often shaped by leaders and supported by the led - Exercise collective consciousness directed to the extent that would stimulate development . The development is generally higher , but not necessarily civilized . The premises in question are as follows: . " Our level of technological advancement is unmatched At this level , we must also prepare our society for peace, and to ensure peace , the technology must be revised to encourage the politics of war . " The technological advancement that is pushed in this direction sets a dangerous precedent for other companies who fear a threat to their sovereignty. They are also urged to develop techniques of war.
In the area of civilization, this mode of development is not commendable, it is not morally justifiable. As it is not morally justifiable , it is socially irresponsible. A site inspection will reveal that it is the latter that is the problem . The latter is the conclusion of two local elders, but in no way logically deduce . What is shown is deducted passionately, and whether conclusion fails to take into account the conclusion of a rational mind prepared , at least when it appeared .
A society that takes place in accordance with previous budgets - especially based on the illogical conclusions - forwarded the psyche of non-negotiable superiority to his people. During this time , the power of passion dictates the pace of human behavior. Whether or want constructive engagement partnerships , the principle of equality does not work exactly the superiority syndrome that captures the leader and the LED . And another company that refuses to participate in collective sensibilities or passion of this company , the expected logic , becomes a real or potential enemy and faces confrontation on all possible fronts.
Most of what we learn about the world , of course, through the media , technology is dominated by the state - of-the- art . Companies that have the most of this technology are also again and again , claimed to be the most advanced . Not only is their progress that rises to the pinnacle of power, superiority and glory. They can also use technology to simplify and improve the understanding of life and nature in a different direction , a direction that tends to eliminate , where possible , prior connection between life and nature that was in many respects , mystical and insecurity. This last point does not necessarily mean that technological progress is a sign of a superior civilization .
What we know is that civilization and technology are not marital terms. Civilized people can have a technology or not. Civilization is not just a matter of science and technology or technical infrastructure , or the wonder of the buildings, but also has to do with moral and mental reflexes of people and their level of social connectivity within their own society and beyond. This is from the distribution for the general behavior of people who could create all kinds of physical structures , so that the issue of science and technology . Therefore , the type of bridges, roads, buildings, machinery, among others, that we can see in a company might say , in general , the pattern of behavior of people . Model behavior can also tell a lot about the extent to which the natural environment has been used for infrastructure , science and technology activities. Importantly, the pattern of behavior could tell a lot about the perception and understanding of people from other people.
I believe - and I think most people believe - that the acceleration of the pace of activity and technology infrastructure , the environment must return to their natural. Once the advances in technology (and its auxiliary structures or ideas ) participates with the natural environment through space , the environment that houses trees , grass , flowers , all kinds of animals and fish should be reduced in size. However, population growth , human incessant desire to quality of life, the need to control life without relying on the unpredictable state of the natural environment has prompted the use of technology . The technology is not necessary to assume excessive risk to the environment. It is the misuse of technology that is involved. While a company can not simply use technology to improve the quality of life , people also have to ask " how technology, we need to protect the natural environment? " Suppose society Y blends the moderate use of technology in order to offset the environmental irresponsible destruction of the latter, then this type of position indicates where the company and is a lover of the principle of balance. As principle , we can conclude with certainty that society Y favors stability in the chaos, and therefore a sense of moral and social responsibility . latest technology points to the sophistication of the human mind , which indicates that the natural environment has been domesticated cavalierly .
If humans do not want to live to thank you for the natural environment - which , of course, is a form of life insurance - but according to their own schedule of rates , then the use of technology is a matter of routine. It seems that the principle of balance that the company has chosen and could it be for a short time and it is more of a position to believe that a true. For when the power of the human mind engages after a momentous achievement in technology , retirement, or , at most , a slowdown is quite unusual . It is as if the human mind is saying, " technological progress must accelerate clear plan or a gradual process is an insult to the curious mind . ". This type of thought process that emphasizes the mystery of the mind, its dark side , not the best place . And trying to query the current mode of a given according to the instructions of the mind technology, it is essential that the role of ethics .
Is it morally right to use this technology for this type of product? And it is morally right to use this type of product? These two questions seem to indicate that the product or products in question are either harmful or not, the environment or not, or not only directly harm humans, but also directly into the environment . And if, as I said , the purpose of technology is to improve the quality of life, and then use the technology to produce products that harm humans and the environment in contradiction with the purpose of technology, and also falsifies demand that human beings are rational. It also suggests that the sophisticated level that the human mind is incapable came to capture the essence or because of the quality of life. In this respect , peaceful coexistence with the natural environment have been abandoned because of a human mind crawling request . The human mind , so to speak , are corrupted with beliefs or ideas that are not viable in a number of ways.
Promotion by environmentalists refer to the issue of environmental degradation and its negative consequences in humans. They insist that there is no justification for the production of high-tech products that are harmful to humans and the natural environment. This argument seems convincing. High technology can show the height of human accomplishment , but can not point to the moral and social responsibility . And at this point , the question may be asked: " How can humans bridge the gap between high-tech and uncontrolled environmental degradation ? "
Too often , modern humans tend to think a sophisticated lifestyle is preferable to a simple. The first is supported by the weight of high technology, it is not primarily . The first is easy to load too dependent on the requirements of the natural environment , the second is not. It tends to seek a symbiotic relationship with the natural environment, the first does not work. If the human comfort must come largely from the technology or the environment is not an issue that can be easily answered . If the natural environment is shrinking due to population growth and other unavoidable causes , it requires advanced technology to alleviate the pressures put human comfort . It is irresponsible proliferation , for example, the technology of war , high- tech products, among others, who are in need of critical and must stop.
No comments:
Post a Comment